Nexla Book a demo

Connect your AI agents to 1,000+ systems. Give them context for every task.

Vendor MCP servers hand agents every tool and none of your business context. Nexla task-specific MCP servers give an agent only the tools and context the task needs, governed by default.

Book a demo See the benchmarks

Task Which campaigns drove pipeline last quarter? 3 of 12 sources in play

The right context, not more context

Same question, two agents. One is handed a vendor MCP server with every tool. One is handed a Nexla task-specific server.

Race summary: the vendor server uses 4.7x more tool calls, 25x more errored calls and 32.7x more tokens than the Nexla task-specific server, per the linked benchmarks.

Vendor MCP server every tool, no business context

Cost of the task, Nexla = 1x

Tool calls
4.7x
Errored calls
25x
Tokens
32.7x

Nexla task-specific MCP only what the task needs

Cost of the task, Nexla = 1x

Tool calls
1x
Errored calls
1x
Tokens
1x

Illustration of the published benchmark ratios: 4.7x fewer tool calls (median, vs Google Ads MCP), 25x fewer errored calls (vs Avoma MCP), 32.7x less token usage (vs HubSpot CRM MCP). Meters show ratios in relative units, with Nexla as 1. Trace steps are schematic, not recorded runs.

Google Ads benchmark Avoma benchmark HubSpot benchmark

Faster, more accurate, more token-efficient

Nexla task-specific servers were tested against vendor MCP servers on identical questions and live accounts. Every answer was checked against independent ground truth.

32.7x
Less token usage per task
Nexla task-specific MCP vs HubSpot CRM MCP

Lower token usage: less context wasted describing irrelevant tools.

Read the HubSpot benchmark
4.7x
Fewer tool calls per task (median)
Nexla task-specific MCP vs Google Ads MCP

Lower latency: fewer calls between the agent and enterprise systems.

Read the Google Ads benchmark
100%
Answer accuracy across 20 tasks
Nexla task-specific MCP vs Google BigQuery MCP

Equal or better accuracy: relevant tools plus the right context. Accurate data read through the wrong context still gives wrong answers.

Read the BigQuery benchmark
25x
Fewer errored tool calls per task
Nexla task-specific MCP vs Avoma MCP Server

Fewer errors: purpose-built tools mean fewer failed calls and retries.

Read the Avoma benchmark

Works with Claude and every MCP client

Nexla MCP servers are compatible with Claude and every other MCP client. Point your client at the server for the task and the agent gets the right tools and context.

1T+records and actions monthly
< 1 weekmedian time to build a new connector
360°context from data, documents, video, actions
// MCP client config (example shape)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nexla-task": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://YOUR-NEXLA-MCP-SERVER-URL"
    }
  }
}

Placeholder URL. Your server URL comes from MCP Studio.

Industries and use cases on nexla.com

Nexla by industry

Find your industry. Let’s build your use case.

Asset Management

Financial Services

Insurance

Government

Healthcare

Retail and Ecommerce

Education

See it on your own systems

Book a demo and we will walk through the servers your agents need.

DoorDash, LiveRamp, LinkedIn, J&J

Over a trillion records a month for enterprises like these.

  • SOC 2 Type II
  • ISO 27001
  • HIPAA
  • GDPR
  • CCPA

Loading the demo form…

*Nexla internal benchmarks. View benchmark results.