More context is not better context.The right context is.

Benchmark 1 of 4: token usage

32.7x less token usage per task

Nexla task-specific MCP vs HubSpot CRM MCP.

Source: the HubSpot benchmark

Less context wasted describing irrelevant tools

A general vendor server describes every tool it has, on every task. A task-specific server describes the few the task needs.

One unit against 32.7

Bars show the ratio, not raw token counts. Vendor = 32.7, Nexla = 1.

Benchmark 2 of 4: tool calls

4.7x fewer tool calls per task

Median per task. Nexla task-specific MCP vs Google Ads MCP.

Source: the Google Ads benchmark

Lower latency

Fewer calls between the agent and your enterprise systems means fewer round trips to wait on.

One call against 4.7

Each dot is one tool call, shown as a ratio of the median.

Benchmark 3 of 4: accuracy

100% answer accuracy across 20 tasks

Nexla task-specific MCP vs Google BigQuery MCP.

Source: the BigQuery benchmark

Equal or better accuracy

Relevant tools plus the right context. Accurate data read through the wrong context still gives wrong answers.

Twenty tasks, twenty checks

Every answer was checked against independent ground truth.

Benchmark 4 of 4: errors

25x fewer errored tool calls per task

Nexla task-specific MCP vs Avoma's MCP Server.

Source: the Avoma benchmark

Fewer errors, fewer retries

Purpose-built tools mean fewer failed calls, and fewer retries to recover from them.

One error tick against 25

Each tick is an errored call, shown as a ratio.